Evaluation of the Use of Interactive Flat Panel (IFP) as a 21st-Century Learning Innovation in Elementary Schools of Sleman Regency

Authors

  • Ahyar Nasukha Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa
  • Akbar Al Masjid Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa
  • Ardian Arief Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56587/bemi.v3i2.158

Keywords:

Interactive Flat Panel, Mixed-methods evaluation, Technology integration

Abstract

Background: The 21st-century educational transformation demands a paradigm shift toward interactive, collaborative, and student-centered digital ecosystems. In response, the government distributed Interactive Flat Panel (IFP) media to elementary schools in Sleman Regency in December 2025 to boost instructional quality. However, post-distribution data indicates a prominent phenomenon where many schools and teachers have not yet optimally integrated this advanced technology into their daily learning processes.

Purpose: This study specifically aims to evaluate the effectiveness and usage patterns of IFP media as a 21st-century learning innovation in elementary schools across Sleman Regency. Additionally, it identifies the supporting and inhibiting factors influencing implementation based on curricular artifacts and documentary evidence to guide future strategic policy directions and teacher mentoring programs.

Method: This evaluative-empirical field research applied a mixed-methods approach. From 556 initial responses, data screening yielded 438 clean datasets, with link validation isolating 353 fully accessible cloud links and 85 restricted links. A micro-level content analysis was then conducted on a stratified random sample of 34 Lesson Plans using a Content Analysis Checklist Sheet, synthesizing descriptive quantitative and qualitative analysis streams through method triangulation.

Findings: The findings reveal a clear gap between high administrative reporting compliance and the depth of actual classroom technology integration. At the macro level, 19.41% of documents face first-order barriers due to locked cloud storage permissions. At the micro level, explicit instructional planning for IFP reached only 35.3% and is heavily dominated by teacher-centered, one-way patterns that relegate the device to the mere substitution level of the SAMR model.

References

Boddy, D. (2008). Management: An introduction (4th ed.). Financial Times Prentice Hall.

Efendi, S., Rahma, A., & Yusuf, M. (2020). Investasi pengadaan perangkat digital sebagai katalisator peningkatan mutu pendidikan dasar abad 21. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Pendidikan, 8(3), 202–215.

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001

Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery. Corwin Press.

Hapsari, R., & Wibowo, A. (2025). Tata kelola penyimpanan awan dalam administrasi pelaporan digital sekolah dasar. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 13(1), 45–56.

Howard, S. K., & Mojejko, A. (2015). Teachers: Technology, anxiety, and time constraints in administrative reporting. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 123–136.

Jones, K. (2018). Educational technology adoption models: Understanding the initial acceptance phase in formal schooling. International Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 78–92.

Kinicki, A., & Williams, B. K. (2020). Management: A practical introduction (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Kurniawan, D. (2022). Standardisasi regulasi literasi tata kelola data digital di lingkungan satuan pendidikan formal. Jurnal Kebijakan Pendidikan, 11(2), 102–115.

Kurniawati, E., & Kristin, F. (2021). Dinamika kapasitas literasi tata kelola data guru dan kendala administratif platform pelaporan digital. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 9(3), 210–224.

Lestari, P., & Handayani, S. (2021). Optimalisasi peran Kelompok Kerja Guru (KKG) dalam pengembangan kompetensi pedagogis berbasis teknologi. Jurnal Ekosistem Pendidikan, 7(2), 134–145.

Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369

Nugroho, B., & Saputra, H. (2026). Hambatan tata kelola penyimpanan awan berkas digital di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Pendidikan, 14(1), 12–25.

Oya, M., & Yuningsih, S. (2024). Pemanfaatan interactive flat panel (IFP) dalam memacu motivasi belajar siswa di kelas dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran, 10(1), 56–69.

Puentedura, R. R. (2013). SAMR: Moving from substitution to redefinition in digital classrooms. Center for Digital Education.

Rahmawati, F., & Utami, T. (2023). Rekomendasi kebijakan strategis intervensi implementasi teknologi di tingkat dasar. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 30(2), 89–101.

Rambe, M., Siregar, H., & Nasution, A. (2019). Transformasi teknologi kelas sebagai katalisator peningkatan mutu pendidikan dasar secara berkelanjutan. Jurnal Mutu Pendidikan, 6(2), 112–124.

Sari, D. P., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2021). Efektivitas pengintegrasian perangkat instruksional interaktif di dalam ruang kelas sekolah dasar. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 9(1), 45–57.

Warschauer, M., Zheng, B., & Niiya, M. (2014). Access and compliance in digital-based reporting: The urban-rural network gap. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 45–62.

Wijaya, A. (2024). Pengambilan kebijakan berbasis data melalui konversi data mentah menjadi actionable insights. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kebijakan Pendidikan, 5(1), 18–31.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-15

How to Cite

Nasukha, A., Al Masjid, A., & Arief, A. (2026). Evaluation of the Use of Interactive Flat Panel (IFP) as a 21st-Century Learning Innovation in Elementary Schools of Sleman Regency. Bulletin of Educational Management and Innovation, 3(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.56587/bemi.v3i2.158